These Tumescent Times
"Give
me chastity and continence, but not just yet."
- St.
Augustine.
I'm at the Vancouver Trade and Convention Centre for The
Everything to Do About Sex Show, an annual sales
celebration of tab A into slot B. You could also describe
the scene as HottieLand. Most of those in attendance,
including the salesunits in the booths, are buffed,
bronzed, aerobicized, inflated, molded or otherwise
modified into Aryan ideals of beauty. (Well, not quite
everyone. Over at one stage, a heavy-set dominatrix busts a
half-hearted move to a techno beat, while parading around a
scrawny leatherboy on a leash.)
I don't see too many smiling faces among the browsers;
there appears to be a certain grim determination in the
buying and selling of pleasure here. The pneumatic
consumers inspecting the lotions, lubricants, videos,
vibrators, sex tour brochures, balms, beads, bondage gear
and buttplugs might as well be Puritans down at the general
store, examining the latest thing in stockades and
horsewhips.
It's been a long, strange journey for lust, from the
catacombs of the early Christian era to the convention
centres of the cosmopolitan present.
From the standpoint of the early church, there were
compelling reasons to include lust among the seven deadly
sins. Clearly, such thoughts and feelings took one's mind
off Higher Things. And not incidentally, policing human
behaviour through guilt and repression turned out to be a
powerful means to herd the sheeple. In the place of lust
and the pursuit of its quarry, the faithful were promised
an afterlife in Heaven - the ultimate cosmic carrot (the
stick being Hell). Not that lust among the laity was
entirely a bad thing from the clergy's point of view. The
sins of the flesh always kept 'em coming back for more
confession.
The demonization of lust has arguably taken a huge toll in
human happiness - though this has to be qualified by the
possibility that repression was one of the principal
drivers behind technical progress in the West. Centuries of
policing eros may well have redirected its energies into
commerce, the arts, and sciences. Sexual shame certainly
never held back the erections on Cape Canaveral and the New
York skyline. But times change. Lust has been subject to
the same cultural currents that have effected gluttony,
sloth, greed and the other so-called deadly sins. All have
been spun into desires promoted and valorized by the
consumer market. They are profitable states of mind - for
the system, if not the individual - and when it comes to
lust, the lucre is positively filthy.
In the USA, the adult porn business is estimated to total
between $10 to $14 billion annually. And that includes the
Internet and video rentals, porn networks, pay-per-view
movies on cable and satellite, in-room hotel movies, phone
sex, sex toys and magazines. This isn't just some frill in
the US economy. Frank Rich, a reporter with
The
New York Times, puts it
succinctly: "Pornography is a bigger business than
professional football, basketball and baseball put
together." People pay more money for pornography in the US
in a year than they do on movie tickets, more than they do
on all the performing arts combined.
And adult porn, in fits and starts, with advances and
occasional retreats, is going mainstream. In 200I, Bell
ExpressVu, the Canadian direct-to-home satellite TV
service, shut down two of its adult film channels, True
Blue and Extasy. The decision to pull the plug came as a
preemptive strike against possible federal regulatory
investigations, following a broadcast on CBC's
Fifth
Estate on the
content of the cable companies' porn shows.
These weren't shows with your average
plumber-meets-housewife plotline. Bell ExpressVu was
offering rape and bondage scenes as standard fare. Somehow
this material escaped the attention of the CRTC, which
perhaps was too busy policing Howard Stern's use of the "F"
word. Or perhaps the regulators looked the other way
because of the size of the players in the Canadian porn
game. The conglomerate BCE Inc. owns Bell Canada, the CTV
television network and The
Globe and Mail - and
Bell ExpressVu. The latter's porn fare originated from
US-based New Frontier Media, North America's leader in the
distribution of hardcore pornography. The company trades on
Nasdaq.
The
Fifth Estate report
indicated other corporate behemoths, such as General
Motors, AT&T, and Time Warner, that have been
"seduced"in the past by trafficking in hardcore porn
through their subsidiaries.
So what's the problem? Joe or Jane Average can vote with a
remote or a mouse. No one is forced to watch any of this
stuff. The argument is convincing on the face of it, but it
leaves out one important variable. Children.
This leads us, naturally enough, to the topic of Britney
Spears, and a performance several years back in Vancouver.
The bubblegum diva is on-stage. She's doffed her duds for a
bra-and-miniskirt pole dance, after which hundreds of
gallons of water rain down on her from the overhead
rigging. She commences to shower on-stage, and launches
into her big hit, Baby One More Time. "At the end of the
song," writes a reviewer from the entertainment
weekly The
Georgia Straight, "four
inflatable condom things flanking the stage slowly become
erect...(with)... a couple of cannons firing arena-filling
geysers into the air."
It all sounds like mindless fun, with the cannon-spunk
counterpointing the teen queen's supposed
celebrity-virginity of the time. But considering the
lip-synching singer had a target audience largely comprised
of prepubescent girls, with thousands of them present in
the audience, you might wonder exactly what messages are
being sent in such performances and why.
In the past 20 years, the demographic for sex-related
consumer markets has expanded, subsuming the elementary
school years. In fact, lust has gone so mainstream that
many of us accept this sort of thing - a Gap ad with
overtly erotic content, for example - as our culture's
background noise. The megacorporations are as ready to push
sexual imagery on kids as they are to offer stronger fare
for an adult audience. This is different, and is some ways
more troubling, than the straightforward problem of
Internet porn - it's the market-endorsed sexualization of
the very young.
"Sex sells tween fashion," announces a recent story
in
The Vancouver Sun,
describing how thong underwear and Playboy Bunny logos are
part of a new fashion trend aimed at young girls. Marketers
pitch fashion brands with names like Porn Star, Hot Buns,
and TNA. According to reporter Kerry Gold, "at a West
Vancouver elementary school, it's cool for a girl to show
her black bra strap underneath her tank or tube top."
For more than a decade, MuchMusic and MTV have portrayed
girls in heels and bikinis, bumping and grinding in
accompaniment to the bass-heavy strut of cock-rock and
hip-hop. For young girls, is this the payoff of decades of
feminism, buying into the semiotics of the strip bar and
the back alley? By the time the Spice Girls came around to
grab the tween female market share, pre-pubescent girls
were insisting on makeup and nail polish. "In 1998, the
year the Spice Girls were at their peak, tweens spent $1.4
billion per year," according to Gold. "In 2002, the figure
had gone up to $1.7 billion per year."
(When my sister went shopping for her daughter at a
high-end boutique specializing in fashions for 8-12 year
olds, she was dismayed to discover padded bras in the
store. She indicated to the staff this was inappropriate
for children, and the what's-your-problem-lady response
from a clerk speaks volumes: "well, the kids seem to like
them!")
Marketers have found an Eldorado in barely formed libidos,
and not incidentally, studies indicate kids are having sex
at younger ages, and music, television and fashion are
implicated in the trend.
In his book The
Disappearance of Childhood, sociologist
Neil Postman points out that the free and easy
commodification of desire - not just in advertising. but in
cable programming and prime time shows - erases an
important distinction between the universe of the child and
the adult:
"One might say that the main difference between an adult
and a child is that the adult knows about certain facets of
life - its mysteries, its contradictions, its violence, its
tragedies - that are not considered for children to know.
As children move toward adulthood, we reveal these secrets
to them in ways we believe they are prepared to manage.
That is why there is such a thing as children's
literature." Postman writes that television, with its
round-the-clock programming, makes this arrangement
impossible. "Television requires a constant supply of novel
and interesting information to hold its audience," he adds.
"This means that all adult secrets - social, sexual,
physical and the like - are revealed. Television forces the
entire culture to come out of the closet, taps every
existing taboo. Incest, divorce, promiscuity, corruption,
adultery, sadism - each is now merely a theme for one or
another television show. And, of course, in the process,
each loses its role as an exclusively adult secret."
Before his death last year, Postman told me that of all his
books, he believes his 1982 study has held up the best.
He's right: the thesis of this work has greater relevance
now than when it was first published. Given the cultural
trajectory since its publication, what does this bode for
the future? "You won't believe how bad television is going
to be in 10 years," said poet Robert Bly in an interview
with writer Michael Ventura. "You're literally going to
have to protect your children from it."
Given the cultural Chernobyl we seem to be up against, we
might wonder how much we have gained over the repressive
climate of earlier generations. Long before there was a
global media to both connect and divide us all, the early
Christians believed no soul existed in isolation: there was
some connection to a divine ground of being. Yes, the flesh
was a source of shame, but such cultural conditioning
emerged partly because the body was - even more then than
now - the vector for communicable illnesses and unwanted
births. And in spite of the perverse view the church took
of lust over the centuries, with all the campfire tales of
hairy palms and soul-sapping succubi, there may be things
more damaging to the self and society than the belief in a
pathologically uptight father figure in the heavens.
Today's sexual freedom may seem infinitely preferable to
the psychological self-abuse of religious-based repression.
But are we willing to pay for this freedom in the currency
of childhood?
The imagery of mass desire for bodies, shoes, cars, homes
and lifestyles, comes with a poison pill. It is the toxin
of isolation-through-desire; we are little more than the
sum of our wants and needs, we are told, which can only be
satisfied through participating in the market. The ideal
consumer is the one alone in the dark in front of a movie
screen, television or computer monitor - watching, paying,
ordering - and suspended in a purgatory of market-driven
desire.
The central dogma of the unregulated, free market is as
false as silicone breasts, though its specifics are rarely
expressed outright. It is the idea that a hole inside one's
soul can be sutured through a financial transaction, and
that the only rituals left of any importance involve buying
or selling. Most adults have intellectual and emotional
barriers to this bright and shining lie. But a child has
none.
So where does that leave us? In a position of greater
responsibility, which many parents now recognize. The
number of homes without televisions is growing, as families
learn that having the one-eyed glowing box as babysitter is
less a welcome distraction than a devil's deal. Marketers
may up the ante in an attempt to grab mindshare, but I
suspect the response will be somewhere between voting with
the remote and a Keith Moon-style window-tossing of the
tube. Protecting children from other areas of the market,
including trends among their own peers, may prove to be a
more difficult task.
Meanwhile, back at the Vancouver Trade and Convention
Centre, the scene has a certain Dante's Inferno feel to it.
My friends are in agreement; its time to go. With some
brochures in hand, we stumble back out into the cool night
air, feeling vaguely creeped out by the adult vision of
sexual liberation. Perhaps it was the joyless looks among
the buffed and bronzed that did it. Wasn't the brave new
world of guilt-free eroticism supposed to be more fun than
this? Does the glum slumming among dildos hint at the
logical absurdity of marketing lust, with sexual ecstasy
reduced to exchange relations between human widgets?
Geoff Olson